Parents and students hold protest over continued school closures
February 10, 2021
A group of parents and students gathered on the corners of El Camino Real at Burlingame Avenue and Broadway Avenue this afternoon to protest the ongoing high school closures. Passing cars honked in support and pedestrians stopped to chat with the protesters, many echoing their sentiments that schools need to reopen more quickly. Led and organized by Burlingame parents Lara McDonald and Ila Kriplani, families from the San Mateo Union High School District (SMUHSD) held signs that read “IN SCHOOL EDUCATION IS ESSENTIAL” and “Mental Health Matters.”
McDonald and Kriplani organized the rally with the hope of attracting attention from Gov. Gavin Newsom or local politicians, such as Sen. Josh Becker, after seeing the mental health and educational challenges that students in the community have struggled with during distance learning. McDonald had written numerous letters to SMUHSD Superintendent Kevin Skelly and the SMUHSD Board of Trustees before deciding to work with Kriplani on organizing a peaceful rally to generate more effective change.
“I’m just concerned for the loss of education,” McDonald said. “I feel you don’t have the same opportunities for social and emotional development when you are remote.”
On Thursday, Feb. 4, the SMUHSD Teachers’ Association agreed upon a memorandum of understanding (MOU) with SMUHSD detailing the terms and conditions for reopening schools. Reopening will not be possible until San Mateo County reaches the red tier, as the county is currently in the purple tier, and will then be conducted in phases, beginning with programs for students with disabilities. In order to reopen, schools need to have adequate HVAC ventilation in all classrooms and conduct contact tracing and thoroughly sanitize classrooms each day, among other safety measures.
Regardless of the MOU, participants at the rally felt that Gov. Newsom must take action from a state-wide level to reopen high schools, allowing students to return before San Mateo County shifts to the orange tier.
Although the MOU does not require teachers to be vaccinated in order for schools to reopen, according to history teacher and Burlingame High School union representative Joshua Gnass, many teachers feel that it will only be safe to return once they are vaccinated.
“[The studies show that] if you follow all of the safety protocols teachers and students will still be safe from Covid. With that said, I’ll be honest and say that a lot of teachers are very suspicious of that, very nervous, sincerely worried for their health and safety,” Gnass said.
Despite teacher concerns that schools will be unsafe without widespread vaccination, McDonald cited a study conducted by Duke University in collaboration with the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill as well as statistics from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention saying that opening schools poses minimal health risks to students and staff. McDonald and Kriplani feel that it is imperative for students to return to school as quickly as possible in order to mitigate educational disparities between students and any potential developmental consequences arising from isolation.
“I literally actually cried over stories that I hear about kids suffering from mental health problems,” McDonald said. “The pandemic has increased those issues — exacerbated them. So, I’m hearing too many stories of children that are suffering.”
Sophomore Archer Grenier, who attended the rally with friends, feels that distance learning presents academic challenges in terms of his attention span, in addition to creating a barrier between students and their peers.
“[My reasons for wanting to return are] pretty much even for me with social development skills as it is with taking in the actual content of school. High school is a big social experience for people and for kids like freshmen who haven’t gotten this, and haven’t gotten this community,” Grenier said.
Freshman Maeve Canniffe was motivated to attend the rally due to her feelings of isolation from her classmates. As a freshman, Canniffe feels disconnected from the school having never been on campus nor having met her teachers in person.
“I just want to see people and remember people [from middle school] that I might have forgotten about,” Canniffe said.
While the district and SMUHSD Teachers’ Association have said that no changes will be made to the reopening plan once the Board approves the MOU, McDonald and the other protesters remain hopeful that the state will take action to reopen high schools.
“This rally is not directed at individual teachers and families appreciate their teachers,” McDonald said. “We feel that with all the science and data out there and the right protocols put in place, that the teachers can be safe and the students can be safe in the school environment.”
As tensions in the community continue to rise over the return to school, Gnass emphasized the importance of finding common ground between teachers and Burlingame families.
“There are people who care about students and teachers, and they want to find a compromise and I think that that’s the bottom line: How do we find that compromise?” Gnass said.
Steven Nelson (Mountain View - former Bd. wth Dr. Skelly as Interum Super) • Mar 4, 2021 at 1:36 pm
I read with interest the late 2020 article on Superintendet Skelly. It is important to remember – the MOU is part of the public policy that ONLY a majority vote of the Board may make. Skelly may recommend, but when he worked for my Board at MVWSD, it was clear that he always tried to respect the Board. The Board majority makes the decisions (votes). Hold your Board accountable for MOUs and other policy direction decisions.
Science, I’m afraid I think the science teacher is right. HS is different than one-teacher K-6th. The use of masks, STRICT MASKING, for preventing respiratory spread is absolutely essential! 2nd offense – U are Back Home dude! (IMO)
Sophie Abitbol • Feb 16, 2021 at 9:36 am
Thank you for your thoughtful reporting, Ameilia!
Molly Abramson • Feb 14, 2021 at 7:41 pm
i will only return to in person learning when the board returns to in person meetings.
Toni Adams • Feb 13, 2021 at 8:43 pm
THANK YOU Mrs.McDonald and the others who rallied last week for our kids. Children around the world of ALL ages are attending school in person safely and have been for some time. We can do this Burlingame, it’s time to do step up for our kids’ health and mental health. Mrs.McDonald please let us know what else can be done/how we can help support your efforts?
Wyatt McGovern • Feb 11, 2021 at 12:07 pm
I completely agree with Mrs. McDonald, with all the MOU safety precautions in place, the risk of infection would be really low. The minimal risk involved with reopening schools means there shouldn’t be a tier requirement for schools to reopen. And, even if school under the MOU precautions is significantly different to normal in-person school, nothing is worse than sitting in your room for months on end.
Michael Dunn • Feb 11, 2021 at 8:34 am
As a teacher at BHS, and as a parent, myself, I sympathize with parents and students. We all desperately want things back to normal. Distance learning, even with all the hard work and extra hours teachers are putting into it, even with all our extra, specialized training, is still a far cry from doing real labs, collaborating side by side with peers, having the social interactions that are not possible right now.
However, we need to look at the data honestly and the implications of live, in person school when infections rates are still high and we have several highly infections variants proliferating in the community. First, the data does NOT show that it is safe to have live, in-person classes. Students and staff who are presymptomatic or asymptomatic can easily slip past the wellness checks and then infect others, leading to new quarantines and potential closures. Schools have been one of the major sources of outbreaks throughout the world and likely played a major role in the surge that preceded the winter holidays. Countless studies have shown that closing schools substantially reduces infection and mortality rates. Even if children are less likely than adults to suffer severe symptoms and death, some still do. Indeed, over 2 million kids have been infected so far, and dozens have died. Dozens more have suffered multi-system failure syndrome and hundreds are suffering long-hauler syndrome. Are we willing to take that risk with even one of our students?
We also must keep in mind that even if no student at BHS were to suffer serious illness or death, coming to school when highly infectious new variants are proliferating (and expected to predominate by mid-March) is a recipe for a new surge that could force us back into another shelter in place. Indeed, experts like Michael Osterhold are predicting another new surge to begin in the next week or two that will be even worse than the last one. If we look at the recent experience of the UK, and several other European countries, even with lockdowns stricter than our own, these new variants continued to spread quickly, overwhelming hospitals and increasing mortality. We’re still in the purple, the most restrictive and dangerous tier possible. Why on Earth would anyone think it’s safe to go into crowded indoor environments now?
Yes, kids (and adults) are suffering mentally from not going to school in person, but returning to in-person school won’t necessarily fix that. Under the current plan, students will have to arrive early, so they can wait in long lines for wellness checks, only to spend their entire day fully masked while watching a live performance of the exact same zoom lessons they’d be getting at home. Only difference? They’d no longer be able to see anyone’s expressions. They’d be hotter and more physically uncomfortable. To many, it will feel cold, unfriendly, impersonal, and oppressive.
We are so close to getting teachers and essential workers vaccinated, yet so far from having infection rates under control. The vaccine could help us get there. So could another few months of restrictions. Why risk everything now, when we’re so close? Why take a chance with the life of a single student? Or their vulnerable family members? Or with any of their teachers and staff members, many of whom are in their fifties, which gives them 4 times the risk of hospitalization and 30 times the risk of death from Covid.
Michael Dunn
BHS Science Teacher