In response, AFSCME helped workers file official retaliation charges against Burlingame with the California Public Employment Relations Board. Even with the suit filed, AFSCME reported continued suppression of speech from Burlingame managers. The lack of progress was a key motive for the strike, which received support from 96% of the union.
“The retaliation and the unfair labor practices kept happening [after the suit was filed],” said AFSCME member Dante Campania, a sewer lead worker. “Nothing was said from city council or city managers [regarding the suit].”
AFSCME states that the strike is solely in response to retaliation and unfair labor practices and bears no relation to contract negotiations and worker compensation. However, these issues are inherently related because the alleged intimidation occurred when the two concerns were voiced to the city council. Currently, AFSCME is six months into negotiating a contract with Burlingame, locking all raises and bonuses until a contract is finalized — one that AFSCME hopes will include a wage hike.
“Our wages are going further and further behind, and we’re experiencing pay cuts in real inflationary terms,” Palmquist said. “If you compare the jobs in Burlingame with other areas and cities, workers are paid less for doing the same work that is more highly compensated by other regional cities around the Bay Area.”